File #: 2017-0344    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Passed
File created: 6/22/2017 In control: Board of Port Commissioners
On agenda: 8/8/2017 Final action: 8/8/2017
Title: BID SPECIFICATION NO. 2017-03 DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS OF TRANSIT SHED 1 AT TENTH AVENUE MARINE TERMINAL SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA A) RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS B) RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISIONS TO CLARIFY THE SCOPE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND RE-ADVERTISE THE PROJECT
Attachments: 1. 4. 2017-0344 Attachment A, 2. 4. 2017-0344A Draft Resolution, 3. 4. 2017-0344B Draft Resolution
DATE: August 8, 2017

SUBJECT:

Title
BID SPECIFICATION NO. 2017-03 DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS OF TRANSIT SHED 1 AT TENTH AVENUE MARINE TERMINAL SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
A) RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS
B) RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISIONS TO CLARIFY THE SCOPE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND RE-ADVERTISE THE PROJECT
Body

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Bid Specification No. 2017-03 Demolition and Site Improvements of Transit Shed 1 at Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal (TAMT)San Diego, California is the first of three (3) contract packages that are under the overall TAMT Shed Demolition & Initial Rail Component - TIGER Grant Project. The scope of the Demolition and Site Improvements of Transit Shed 1 at Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal San Diego, California consists of the demolition of an obsolete and underutilized transit shed and grading and compaction to support a finished pavement (Project). The Engineer's Estimate for this contract is $12M.

On June 28, 2017, four (4) bids were received ranging in cost from $13,131,313.00 to $15,460,260.65. The bid specifications require the bidders to submit a total contract bid amount including the base bid plus two (2) additive bid alternates, each alternate consists of a different type of pavement system to be located in the current footprint of Bays 'A' and 'B'. Only one pavement type will be chosen; however, the determination of low bidder is determined by adding the base bid amount plus both additive alternate amounts. The structure of this determination is to encourage competitive bid prices for both pavement system types.

The bids received were confusing and even included negative number for one of the additive bid items. Two protests were also submitted by bidders pointing out irregularities in the bids received. Due to the perceived confusion on behalf of the bidders the District recommends that the Board reject all bids and re-advertise the project without additive bid items.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation
A) Adopt a resoluti...

Click here for full text