Legislation Details

File #: 2020-0248    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Passed
File created: 7/1/2020 In control: Board of Port Commissioners
On agenda: 8/18/2020 Final action: 8/18/2020
Title: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT TO MAKE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES, AND TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE DIRECTORY OF CLASS SPECIFICATIONS
Attachments: 1. 8. 2020-0248 Attachment A, 2. 8. 2020-0248 Attachment B, 3. 8. 2020-0248 Draft Ordinance

DATE:                      August 18, 2020

 

SUBJECT:

 

Title

ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT TO MAKE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES, AND TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE DIRECTORY OF CLASS SPECIFICATIONS

 

Body

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

 

An amendment to the Conflict of Interest Code of the San Diego Unified Port District (District) is necessary to reflect recent changes to the District’s Directory of Class Specifications and to make administrative changes to the Code.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

Recommendation

Adopt an Ordinance amending the Conflict of Interest Code of the San Diego Unified Port District. Appendix A (List of Designated Employees) to update the list of staff positions that are required to file a Statement of Economic Interests, and to make administrative changes to Appendix C (Consultant Disclosure)

Body

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

 

This agenda item has no fiscal impact.

 

Compass Strategic Goals:

 

This agenda item supports the following Strategic Goal(s).

 

                     A Port that the public understands and trusts.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

As a local government agency, the District is required to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code (Code) in accordance with the Political Reform Action (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) and BPC Policy No. 024-A, adopted by Resolution No. 70-254 on November 17, 1970.  The District’s Code designated certain staff positions as “designated employees” who are required to file annual Statements of Economic Interest.  The District’s Code also outlines the disclosure category or reporting level of each “designated employee”.  In addition, the District’s Code incorporates the requirement that the District abide by the provisions of the Political Reform Act as it exists or may be amended from time to time by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC).

 

The FPPC requires that all local government agencies review their codes biennially.  District staff has reviewed the District’s Code and as a result it is recommended that Appendix A (List of Designated Employees) to the District’s Code be amended to update the list of staff positions that are required to file a statement of Economic Interest.  In addition, modifications to Appendix C (Consultant Disclosure) are required to update the referenced government codes.

 

The District’s Code was last amended August 2018.  Once approved by the Board of Port Commissioners, the District’s amended Code will be submitted to the District’s Code Reviewing Body, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, for review and approval.

 

General Counsel’s Comments:

 

The Office of the General Counsel has reviewed and approved this agenda and proposed ordinance, as presented, as to form and legality.

 

 

Environmental Review:

 

The proposed Board action, including without limitation, an ordinance amending the Code to make administrative changes and to reflect changes to the Directory of Class Specifications, does not constitute a “project” under the definition set forth in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 because it will not have a potential to result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA. No further action under CEQA is required.

 

The proposed Board action allows for the District to implement its obligation under Sections 21 and 35 of the Port Act, which allow for the Board to pass all necessary ordinances and resolutions for the regulation of the district, and do all other acts necessary and convenient for the exercise of its powers. The Port Act was enacted by the California Legislature and is consistent with the Public Trust Doctrine. Consequently, the proposed Board action is consistent with the Public Trust Doctrine.

 

The proposed Board action does not allow for “development,” as defined in Section 30106 of the California Coastal Act, or “new development,” pursuant to Section 1.a. of the District’s Coastal Development Permit Regulations. Therefore, issuance of a Coastal Development Permit or exclusion is not required.

 

Equal Opportunity Program:

 

Not Applicable

 

PREPARED BY:

 

Cynthia Holder

Deputy District Clerk / Records Manager

 

 

Attachment(s):

Attachment A - Appendix A: List of Designated Employees

Attachment B - Appendix C: Consultant Disclosure